Justifying the Iraq War :: Politics Wars Middle East Bush Iraq Essays

The ensuing contend among the join States and Iraq has been a musical theme of controversy for several years now. Citizens of America open been divided since the struggle began and continue to cluster in groups that either to the full support or return no support for President bush and this ongoing state of contendfare. many an(prenominal) would like to know who is discipline and who is wrong. Is this war with Iraq honourableifiable, or has America jumped into something that could gain possibly been avoided? To answer these questions a comparison should be made between the characteristics of this war and those that constitute a estimable war. provided war is a term which implies that a certain war is congenial and retributiveifiable found on certain conditions. The conditions for having a just war include those which mustiness be visible ahead a war can be decl bed (Jus Ad Bellum) as well as those that must be followed during a war (Jus In Bello). Some of the con ditions that are necessary before war is declared include having a just cause for war, having the right intentions for war, and having no other alternative but war (1). Once enmeshed in a war other criteria employ such as the acts of war must be aimed those doing wrong and non at costless civilians, prisoners of war should be treated humanely and with respect, and eventually that there be no torture of any kind to s superannuatediers of the contend army. If these characteristics are wander up against the United States and their strikes on Iraq, there is abruptly no route that the just war theory could classify this war as existence just.The primary criterion for any war to be labeled as a just war is for that war to be declared for a just cause. The United States clearly did not have any such cause for launching a war against Iraq. The scouring administrations newly proposed doctrine of pre-emption declares the right to develop strikes against states that are deemed to be future day holy terrors against the US (2). Under the rules of just war, just cause is draw as self defense against an attack in order to deliver innocent life, not pre-emptive strikes against possible dangers. The fact is, is that although the intellection of attacking a nation that does not pose a threat today, but whitethorn pose one in the near future is as old as war itself, it completely goes against the precedents set onwards by the just war theory(2).Justifying the Iraq War Politics Wars Middle eastbound Bush Iraq EssaysThe ensuing war between the United States and Iraq has been a topic of controversy for several years now. Citizens of America have been divided since the war began and continue to cluster in groups that either fully support or have no support for President Bush and this ongoing war. Many would like to know who is right and who is wrong. Is this war with Iraq justifiable, or has America jumped into something that could have possibly been avoided? To answer these questions a comparison should be made between the characteristics of this war and those that constitute a just war. Just war is a term which implies that a certain war is acceptable and justifiable based on certain conditions. The conditions for having a just war include those which must be visible before a war can be declared (Jus Ad Bellum) as well as those that must be followed during a war (Jus In Bello). Some of the conditions that are necessary before war is declared include having a just cause for war, having the right intentions for war, and having no other alternative but war (1). Once engaged in a war other criteria apply such as the acts of war must be aimed those doing wrong and not at innocent civilians, prisoners of war should be treated humanely and with respect, and finally that there be no torture of any kind to soldiers of the opposing army. If these characteristics are put up against the United States and their strikes on Iraq, there is absolutely no way that the just war theory could classify this war as being just.The primary criterion for any war to be labeled as a just war is for that war to be declared for a just cause. The United States clearly did not have any such cause for launching a war against Iraq. The Bush administrations newly proposed doctrine of pre-emption declares the right to initiate strikes against states that are deemed to be future threats against the US (2). Under the rules of just war, just cause is described as self defense against an attack in order to preserve innocent life, not pre-emptive strikes against possible dangers. The fact is, is that although the idea of attacking a nation that does not pose a threat today, but may pose one in the near future is as old as war itself, it completely goes against the precedents set forth by the just war theory(2).