Set theory

Set theorySet Theory and Georg precentor Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Phillipp Cantor, or Georg Cantor, was unmatched of the ground cracking mathematicians to approach the idea of timelessness. He worked intensively with circumstances theory, working with the cardinality of situateds, one-to-one correspondence, transcendental numbers, and unalike types of infinity. Over the course of the study, we sh every(prenominal) take a journey through Cantors life, works, and arguments. First, Richard Dedikind proposed the proposition of infinity. He, kind of of constructing it, began to recognize it, avoiding an argument make by Gauss I protest against the use of infinite magnitude as something completed, which in mathematics is never permissible. Infinity is just a Faon de parler, the real meaning being a limit which certain ratios have approached indefinitely near, while others are permitted to increase without restriction.Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Phillipp Cantor was born(p) in 1845 in Sa int Petersburg, Russia. He was a talented violinist having inherited skills from his father and mother. His father worked in the Saint Petersburg stock exchange. Cantor lived in Russia until he turned eleven. He got sick that year and the family moved to Germany to experience warmer winters. Cantor graduated from Darmstadt in 1860 in 1862, he was enrolled in the federal official Polytechnic Institution in Zurich. When his father died, he received an inheritance that enabled him to attend the university ofg Berlin in 1862. He received his PhD in 1867 for his math paper on number theory. Cantor first began teaching at a girls school. He then moved to the University of Halle where he would be promoted to Extraordinary Professor in 1872 and climb professor in 1879. He achieved this status at the young age of 32. Unsatisfied, he wanted to pursue a better job. But his colleague, Leopold Kronecker fundamentally disagreed with Cantors studies. He believed it was incorrect to propose a har dening with certain qualities without giving certain examples. Georg Cantor suffered from his first bout with depression in 1884. Because of this he took a break from math and began to teach philosophy. He did begin to work with math again, but it was not of the same(p) caliber as before. He tried to reconcile with Kronecker who enthusiastically accepted, but their views on mathematics and philosophy still opposed each other. Many people suggest that because of this conflict Cantor was depressed, but others think it was a cause of his bipolarity. Cantor retired from mathematics in 1913 and suffered from poverty because of WW1. He died on January 1918 in the asylum where he spent his final years. As a mathematician, Cantor contributed many things to the mathematical field. H developed Set theory. He developed countability, denumerability, and 1-to-1 correspondences between rectifys. He was the first mathematician to theorize different surfaces of infinity. Back then infinity was more(prenominal) of a philosophical topic rather than a mathematical topic. Plus, he received a lot of criticism from Leopold Kronecker. So how is a trammel defined? Cantor defined a set as, a collection into a whole, of definite, well-distinguished objects (called the divisors of the set) of our perception or of our thought. For example, every even number from 1 to 100 puke be considered a set. Every prime number from 1 to 1000 can be considered a set. Even the amount of vegetables in the world can be considered a set. A set is just a group.In a set, order is not important, for the sets 1,2,3,4,5 and the sets 4,5,2,3,1 are considered equal. To write that set L is equal to set H, you could write L=H. For that to be true, all the elements in set L have to be in set H, and the elements would all have to be equal. If set L contained 1,2,3, the set H must contain 1,2,3. However, if L has only some of the elements of H, we call L a subset of H. To direct that something is an element of L, we use the symbol . If mL, it represents m is an element of set L. To represent unions between sets, we use. L M means the union of sets L and M. We use the symbol when describing an intersection between sets. We use this notation when trying to find an element between two sets. To get a better way of the use, let O be the set of one and only(a) integers from 1-10 and let P be the set of prime integers from 1-10. When we see O P, the elements of that intersection would be 3, 5, 7. If we make a union between the sets, the elements of the union would be 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9. You can think of union and intersections in the form of a Venn diagram. An intersection would be only the area where the circles intersect. A union would be the entire thing the middle and the sides. Other important facts about set theory are cardinality and ordinal numbers. The cardinal number of a set represents the amount of elements in a set. An elements ordinal number shows where the number is in a seque nce. Sometimes in well-ordered sets you can have each element with its ordinal number. Cantor developed the term enumerability. When a set is enumerable, it means that is cardinal number is the same size as the natural numbers or is the same size as a subset of the natural numbers. In a countable set, in that respect exists an injective function. An injective function is when you can associate distinct values with distinct arguments. This is also referred to as a 1-to-1 function. In addition to injective functions, there is a surjective function where for the function f(x)= y, there exists more than one x value to one y value. Bijection is when for f(x) = y between sets, there exists one and only one value of y. a bijective function is different from an injective function because in an injective function, you can map all them elements from set A to set B with some elements in B left over when with a bijective function all the elements in set A must map over to set B with only one c orresponding element. So where does this all tie into Cantors work? Well, to start off he was the first one to actually work with set theory. Through his work, he was able to prove that the set of odd integers is equal to the set of integers overall. For this proof, let us assume that the amount of even integers is equal to the amount of odd integers. Now, people will think, But arent the odd integers a subset of the integers? True, but subsets can have the same cardinality as the whole set. The way Cantor proved this was through proving the odd integers equal to the number of integers with a bijective function f (x) = y = 2x+1, where x is an element of the entire set of integers. This way, -3 would go to 5, -2 would go to -3, -1 would go to -1, and 0 would go to -1. Through this, Cantor make a groundbreaking discovery. It would lead on to understanding different kinds of infinity.Cantor came up with two great theorems. The first one, Cantors Theorem showed that the mogul set of a set is larger than the set itself. A power set contains all the subsets of a set. Consider a set whose elements are 1, 2. The power set of this set would be , 1, 2, 1, 2. The cardinality of this power set is 4. 4 is greater than two. As we described before, we showed that two sets have the same cardinality if they have the same number of elements and there exists a 1 to 1 correspondence. He proved his theorem by finding a subset, B, that was not in A. Consider a set, A, and its power set P(A). The subset B would be represented byF(x) is a general bijective function that maps the elements of set As power set to the elements of set A. This shows that for any element x of A, x is an element of B if and only if x does not equal f(x). But then that would mean x is an element of B where x isnt an element of f(x) and then x is not an element of B? ImpossibleOne of the most famous proofs of set theory was the diagonal proof by Cantor. He applied it to show that the real numbers were more nu merous than the naturals, therefore proving the existence of uncountable sets. To prove it, we will use contradiction. Consider a controversy of the real numbers that could be put into a 1-to-1 correspondence with the naturals.1 .56576782 .33646253 .24253644 .35446575 .35354656 .13243547 .2000000Because of their 1 to one correspondence, should we try to construct another element in the list of real numbers, it would already be accounted for. But what the diagonal argument did was it took the first finger of the fist element, the second bod of the second element and so on and so on, all the way to the nth digit and added one to each individual digit mod ten. What would happen is we would add one to the first digit 5 mod ten and get six. Then we would add 1 to the second digit 3 mod ten and get 4. The pattern of numbers follows a diagonal formation, such as the numbers highlighted below.1 .56576782 .33646253 .24253644 .35446575 .35354656 .13243547 .2000000 The digits we would get are 6, , 3, 5, 5, 6, and 1. From these digits, we make a decimal with each digit in the spot respective to the element they were taken from. For example, 6 would be the first digit because it was taken from the 1st element. 4 would be the next one for it was taken from the second element, and so on and so on. Following that pattern, we would construct the number .6435561. This beauty of this proof is we have just constructed a number that isnt part of the list Why? For example, if we looked at the mth digit of this saucily number and the mth digit of the mth element of the list, we would see that they differ by that one number, thereby having created a new number. What we have done here is just made a way to make an infinite list strictly larger than the naturals therefore proving the existence of uncountable sets. What makes this proof so much more amazing is that there are so many ways to represent it. I used decimals to represent it. However, other people might use two variable s and just slip them when changing by one. Other people might only use 0 and 1. Cantors work became an important part of other mathematicians work. It became an important part in Russells Paradox, Godels Incompleteness theorem, and Turings Entscheidungsproblem (German for decision problem)Through Cantors groundbreaking work, mathematicians were finally able to approach the concept of infinity. No longer was the topic reserved for the philosophers. Infinity could be used as a mathematical field.