Comparing and contrasting Bandura’s cognitive theory Essay

Introduction by chance there are as numerous differences as there are akin(predicate)ities between the ideas expressed in Banduras Cognitive Theory and Becks Cognitive Theory. Many similarities exist between the both theories because they are twain based on the study of human way and personality. However, the ideas expressed and mechanisms employ in analysis confer some discord between the twain theories. It is evident that no two persons in the world would have unaccompanied similar thoughts about a phenomenon hence, differences are always abound.Since studies in similar fields are usually related in a way, prevalence of similarities should not proceed as a surprise. For example, the fact that behavior is touch on by, among other things, the milieu, is embraced in the detail of both theories. The two theorists are as well as of common opinion that nix thoughts are likely to trigger negative behavior and dysfunction in many activities. For example, Banduras theory hig hlights that passel with high opinions about themselves are usually better performers in many activities than those who weigh themselves on a lower scale.In the same way, Becks theory is emphatic of the point that negative thoughts in people start such people to have low opinion of themselves and evaluate themselves negatively. Banduras Cognitive Theory and Becks Cognitive Theory both work out the environment as a determinant of personality and behavior. dapple Bandura (1976) employ environmental factors in his triad, Beck (1976) showed that the world (in reference to the environment) is one of the factors that shape a persons behavior, attitudes and perceptions about various phenomena.Both theorists agree that the environment acts together with other factors to shape a persons reference book and behavior. For instance, Bandura (1986) observed that aggressive behavior in adolescents is caused by the environment, but the behavior as well creates an environment. Bandura referred to such a relationship as multiplicative inverse determinism. On the other hand, Beck (1976) noted that the world shapes a persons character since a person acts in accordance with what is happening in the general world.Disparities in Banduras and Becks theories are evident right from the beginning of the model. While there is a similarity of the use of a triad, the constituents of the triads are the rootage of dissonance. This is in addition to many other instances in the illustration of the applications of the two models. This piece gives an analysis of the similarities and differences in the two theories and the implications or causes of such scenario. Moreover, the paper will highlight the key areas where similarities as well as differences occur between the two theories.