Barriers to Effective Communication Essay

Effective communication is a major agent to success in any relationship, business, or organization. conversation barriers attempt to impede, and in some instances stop, the successful completion of the communication process. Law Enforcement agencies ar liable(predicate) to the consequences of in legal communication and should work toward reducing and eliminating barriers blocking the flow of communication. organizational f legal philosophys in the entangled hodgepodge of agencies at bottom the Ameri tail criminal nicety clay cause various communication barriers resulting in confusion and inefficiencies end-to-end the system.Law enforcement agencies began bundle to a greater extent information after the attacks on 9/11 moreover barriers still exist. sympathy the communication process and employ restless perceive skills is vital to overcoming barriers to effective communication. Process of Communication W tout ensembleace and Roberson (2009) outline communication as, a process involving several steps, among two or more persons, for the primary purpose of exchanging information (p. 15). The communication process is dependent on the senders ability to create an perceivable put across for the receiving system and the receiving systems ability to interpret the pass.The process begins by transmittance an idea into a centre made of carefully chosen symbols understandable to the receiver (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). To ensure success of the communication process, the sender should consider the recipients point of view while forming the message and selecting the means of transmission. The message can take the form of writing, speaking, or movement (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). Receipt of the message is very important or the process of communication stops. S goal the message using the appropriate medium continues the communication process to the next step.Understanding the idea of the message requires interpretation by the recipient. The receiver int erprets the message and provides feedback to the sender. Feedback indicates recognize of the message and whether the message was understood or requires more information. pro forma and daily Channels of Communication Information flows up and down through the guard organizations according to the chain of command. The formal channels of communication within guard organizations require strict adherence to order, written memorandums, and directives (Wallace & Roberson, 2009).The Momentum that information flows within the formal channels is slow creating a delay in sharing new information throughout the organization. Slow transmission reduces organizational efficiency, wastes priceless time, resources, and puts the reputation of the legal philosophy operation at risk. Formal channels are restrictive and at times seem unnecessary but police agencies do receive benefits using the formal channels. Through formal channels, all officers receive the same directions in an understandable m essage that reduces confusion among officers and creates enfranchisement for later reference (Wallace & Roberson, 2009).Informal channels of communication exist in all law enforcement agencies and are used to pass information outside the formal channels of communication. Informal channels of communication give officers a break from the rigid protocol of formal channels. Opportunities for personal discussions that build chumminess naturally improve morale and work performance. Police agencies know the benefits of daily channels of communication. When the right balance of formal and informal communications is achieved, the agency becomes a united police force.Overcoming Barriers to Effective CommunicationThe barriers that influence effective communication within the criminal justice system are delirious barriers, physical barriers, semantic barriers, and ineffective listening (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). The sender and receiver both can contribute steamy barriers reducing effectiv e communication by allowing beliefs, attitudes, perceptions, and life experiences to enter the process. Criminal justice professionals can overcome emotional barriers by using peer support systems within the police subdivision or support from outside sources (Wallace & Roberson, 2009).Physical barriers are obstructions that interfere with movement of a message and are the hardest to overcome. The weather, distance, and failures in technology are a few examples of physical barriers a police officer may hap (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). Some barriers are out of the officers control and cannot be overcome quickly such as an ice storm that becomes a physical barrier when power and teleph unrivalled lines go down ending communication. Semantic barriers consist of language differences and ambiguous word meanings and prevent a clear exchange of ideas resulting in failed communication.Hiring a diverse group of officers can reduce language barriers and choosing words carefully with the recei ver in mind can help ease semantic barriers. Ineffective listening is some other barrier present in the criminal justice system and occurs from disinterest, speaker bias, emotions, distractions, and words that invoke emotion (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). Every officer needs supple listening skills. An officer using active listening skills can give out dangerous situations when armed with a clear understanding of the circumstances.Active listening is different from hearing. Hearing is an automatic response to sound and listening is an act. magical spell using active listening skills the officer is processing what the speaker is manifestation with interest, free of speaker bias, and emotions, before giving a response (Wallace & Roberson, 2009). up and eliminating barriers to effective communication is achieved through education and self-improvement courses offered as spot of a criminal justice professionals continuing education.Communication Failure 9/11The repercussions of fail ed communication can be seen in the attacks of 9/11. Many factors contributed to known terrorists entering the United States undetected and successfully killing Americans. Ineffective communication resulting in communication failure is one variable that allowed the United States to be attacked by terrorist from another country. The structure of American law enforcement agencies is conducive to linkage blindness. Grant and Terry (2008) define linkage blindness as, the inability to analyze and link critical information across or within agencies (p. ).Communication failed because Federal law enforcement agencies did not share terrorist information with state and local law enforcement agencies. Competition and territorial avarice between agencies contributed to the loss of communication within the law enforcement community (Grant & Terry, 2008). go around (2007) stated, Almost all assessments of the attacks of September 11, 2001 have concluded U. S. Intelligence and law enforcement a gencies had failed to share information that might have provided advance warning of the spell (Summary, para. 1).Congress eventually acknowledged communication barriers exist within the system of law enforcement agencies and enacted commandment and regulation to facilitate the sharing of information. Conclusion virtually communication barriers can be overcome by using jet sense and active listening devoid of emotion and bias. Police agencies and one-on-one criminal justice professionals are responsible for learning and using active listening skills. Understanding the communication process reveals strategies to overcoming barriers that block the flow of information.Formal and informal channels of communication can drive the movement of messages previous or stop movement completely. When terrorists attacked the United States September 11, 2001 Congress enacted legislation and regulations to tear down the communication barriers that existed between law enforcement agencies. Commu nication barriers get out always exist within the structure of American law enforcement agencies but efforts will continue to eliminate barriers within reach and reduce those harder to reach.